Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <001801c0da37$307786d0$e9332041@campbell>
From: "Christopher Dale Campbell" <DaleCampbell AT revolutionist DOT com>
To: "bowman" <bowman AT montana DOT com>
Cc: "Cygwin" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <001501c0da1a$f990b8b0$e9332041 AT campbell> <078901c0da23$a45ddfe0$4ad41ad0 AT mshome DOT net>
Subject: Re: Entry Point Not Found
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 12:26:53 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Which version of cygwin was this supposed to refer to?  I set the
permissions of Everybody to everything except "modify or change
permissions" (recursive to the whole \cygwin\ directory) and still
had the same problems with both versions.

From: "bowman" <bowman AT montana DOT com>

> What are your security settings on the cygwin directories? You
> might want to grant r/w to Everyone recursively for the whole tree.
> Also, watch for any /tmp or other directories. In many cases, C:\
> directories will default out to Everyone, but on other drives, the
> directory is owned by the creator, and not other users have write
> permissions.
> 
> Win2000 has tightened the security up; my gut feeling is a
> PowerUser on 2000 == a User on NT4.0, and a User on 2000 is lucky
> to be able to log on and read anything.
> 
> There are also issues with Users accessing raw sockets that I have
> not been able to resolve on 2000; there was a registry hack on NT,
> but it doesn't do the trick on 2000.
> 
> You can also modify the security profiles, but you need to know
> what you are doing. Also, if you are on a LAN, in many cases the
> Domain security profile will override anything you try to do on the
> local machine.
> 
> Good luck. We aren't using cygwin, but the NutCracker (DataFocus) /
> SCO XVision tools, and the migration from NT4.0 to 2000 has been,
> er,
> interesting so far.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBOvwSy4XnWfGgRqP+EQLRMgCeK36Ofit8iDaR/pmYGjQri/1ZIekAoJLZ
r+x4lTjlp+dG2mOOJa9cjAJs
=2DVo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple