Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <078901c0da23$a45ddfe0$4ad41ad0@mshome.net> From: "bowman" To: , "Christopher Dale Campbell" References: <001501c0da1a$f990b8b0$e9332041 AT campbell> Subject: Re: Entry Point Not Found Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 08:06:55 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 From: "Christopher Dale Campbell" > Both versions, as well as any programs (compiled by me or not) work > just fine. Could this be a problem with only Windows2000 (or NT)? What are your security settings on the cygwin directories? You might want to grant r/w to Everyone recursively for the whole tree. Also, watch for any /tmp or other directories. In many cases, C:\ directories will default out to Everyone, but on other drives, the directory is owned by the creator, and not other users have write permissions. Win2000 has tightened the security up; my gut feeling is a PowerUser on 2000 == a User on NT4.0, and a User on 2000 is lucky to be able to log on and read anything. There are also issues with Users accessing raw sockets that I have not been able to resolve on 2000; there was a registry hack on NT, but it doesn't do the trick on 2000. You can also modify the security profiles, but you need to know what you are doing. Also, if you are on a LAN, in many cases the Domain security profile will override anything you try to do on the local machine. Good luck. We aren't using cygwin, but the NutCracker (DataFocus) / SCO XVision tools, and the migration from NT4.0 to 2000 has been, er, interesting so far. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple