Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <00b501c0d6fc$650b0ea0$0100a8c0@mshome.net>
From: "bowman" <bowman AT montana DOT com>
Cc: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <3AF545B3 DOT D4577F40 AT whsc DOT vic DOT edu DOT au> <3AF69A2B DOT 6E135D8C AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Subject: Re: 1.3.1: gcc-2.95.3-4 bug with scanf() for floating-point numbers on  Win2k
Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 07:48:20 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

From: "Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
>  In fact, somebody else who ALSO refused to
> search in the mailing list archives asked this question less than 12
> hours ago.

Perhaps an readily accessible  page of known bugs would be more effective
than searching mail archives? I'd estimate my success on searching archives
to be about 50%, with many hits on non-relevant headers, and quite a bit of
searching through threads for the answer, not the question.



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple