Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <20010504153944.6093.qmail@web3306.mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 08:39:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom Dorgan <tdorgan AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject: Re: amazingly long ls times
To: Cygwin Users <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <3AF2CCDE.B648C930@yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

cool. thanks for your time.
--- Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com> wrote:
> Tom Dorgan wrote:
> > 
> > hello,
> > 
> > been using cygwin for around 2 years. been keeping up with the
> updates.
> > running on win2k. "lately" have noticed ls seems sluggish. check
> this
> > out:
> > $ time ls -aF
> > <86 filenames deleted>
> > real    0m9.224s
> > user    0m0.060s
> > sys     0m0.090s
> > $
> > 
> > this seems typical. my disk has been scrubbed with de-fragmenter.
> was
> > using ~123/256mb at time of command. doesnt seem right.
> > 
> 
> The developers are currently aware of the slowness and are working at
> getting responsiveness improved.  I've just submitted a patch to
> Newlib
> which will help with your reported long ls time once the patch is
> approved.
> 
> Earnie.
> 
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple