Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com From: "Michael Erdely" To: Subject: RE: Tab-completion problems (was: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: bash-2.05-4) Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 11:18:15 -0400 Message-ID: <0EA1EE20FBC6D411B98A00D0B77407A2026AB246@KRYPTONMAIL> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2462.0000 In-Reply-To: <3AF2C314.86FA51BE@decodon.com> Neophyte Guess: Did you run: strip bash.exe? -ME -----Original Message----- From: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com [mailto:cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com] On Behalf Of Frank-Michael Moser Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 10:56 AM To: Cygwin Users Subject: Re: Tab-completion problems (was: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: bash-2.05-4) I'm rather sure that I installed latest releases using setup.exe. rlversion gives 4.1. When I extract Corinna's bash-2.05-4.tar.gz the problem comes up again. I go into my /install/src/bash-2.05 and after "make inatall" problem is gone again. Corinna's bash.exe has 473.600 bytes. Self made bash.exe has 1.740.898 bytes?! Frank-Michael. Earnie Boyd wrote: > > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 08:48:32AM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote: > > > Frank-Michael Moser wrote: > > > > > > > > You are right, I just proved it: > > > > downloaded bash-2.05-4-src.tar.gz, compiled, > > > > installed, and the problem is gone!!! > > > > > > > > What is going on here that extracting bash-2.05-4.tar.gz behaves > > > > different than making bash-2.05-4-src.tar.gz? > > > > > > > > > > Hmm... Versions of preinstalled readline.dll? Just a guess based > > > on the fact that readline is where the tab completion code exists. > > > > But that doesn't explain why it works on my box. I have just checked > > that I'm using the latest readline available (4.1-2) and I'm using > > exactly the binary which I have uploaded to sourceware. > > > > But does Frank-Michael have the latest readline available? Perhaps he > chose to only update bash and not readline. Does the new bash > executable work with an older readline.dll? > > Earnie. > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > -- > Want to unsubscribe from this list? > Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple -- ------------------------------------------------------------ DECODON GmbH phone: +49(0)3834 515230 W.-Rathenau-Str. 49a fax: +49(0)3834 515239 17489 Greifswald email: moser AT decodon DOT com Germany web: www.decodon.com ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple