Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Apparently-From: <earnie?boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Message-ID: <3AF28E65.B7573CB6@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2001 07:11:33 -0400
From: Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To: Cygwin Users <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andy Piper <andyp AT bea DOT com>
CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: When will cygwin ever be stable?
References: <4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 2 DOT 20010503170938 DOT 00b5a530 AT san-francisco DOT beasys DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Andy Piper wrote:
> 
> egor duda <deo at logos-m dot ru> wrote:
>  > i wonder if it was my changes to w32api that change _ANONYMOUS_*
>  > semantics? they surely can break applications that include headers
>  > individually without including <windows.h> first. since you didn't
> 
> Actually this was the cause of the problem, and it existed because I was
> using code that originated from the cygwin setup - which had the same
> problems. I'm not sure that including individual headers is wrong - but
> there we go.
> 

According to the w32api maintainer, including individual headers is
wrong.

Earnie.
The w32api maintainer.

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple