Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010503170146.00b58100@san-francisco.beasys.com>
X-Sender: andyp AT san-francisco DOT beasys DOT com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 17:08:10 -0700
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Andy Piper <andyp AT bea DOT com>
Subject: Re: When will cygwin ever be stable? 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

Louis Bohm wrote:

 > I do not know about the other points you made but I can tell you that 
the scroll
 > bars do work when you are running rxvt.  Maybe you should try that instead.

So let me understand this, in order to get a functional terminal I have to 
use a package that is not even shipped with the standard install? No 
standard user is ever going to do this, they are just going to get hacked 
off with it being broken. A better reason for using rxvt might be because 
its faster.

Maybe everyone in the know uses rxvt and that's why the standard terminal 
is not so great?

andy


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple