Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com X-Apparently-From: Message-ID: <3AF152F1.216861EE@yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 08:45:37 -0400 From: Earnie Boyd Reply-To: Cygwin Users X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Robinow, David" CC: "'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" Subject: Re: May need a ghostscript maintainer References: <80575AFA5F0DD31197CE00805F650D7602CF01 AT wilber DOT adroit DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit "Robinow, David" wrote: > > > From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com] > > Subject: Re: May need a ghostscript maintainer > > Norman Vine wrote: > > > My question to the list is > > > "Should I submit my makefile to the ghostscript maintainers > > > for inclusion in the main ghostscript distribution as cygwin.mak" > > > > > > > Yuck!! How about modifying the configure.in to do the right thing for > > Cygwin?! > Sadly, ghostscript doesn't use configure/autoconf > Ah, well that's a different story. Yes, then a cygwin.mak or Makefile.cygwin makes since. I would prefer Makefile.cygwin. Earnie. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple