Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <3AF1515B.42137DE5@etr-usa.com>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 06:38:51 -0600
From: Warren Young <warren AT etr-usa DOT com>
Organization: -ENOENT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: egor duda <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: When will cygwin ever be stable?
References: <4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 2 DOT 20010501102110 DOT 02e99390 AT san-francisco DOT beasys DOT com> <17105307514 DOT 20010501224113 AT logos-m DOT ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

egor duda wrote:
> 
> i wholeheartedly agree that lots of cygwin users will benefit from
> rock-stable cygwin. the main question is "what cygwin team should do
> for this?" 

To answer this it might be helpful to know where Cygwin is going.  I
assume that the overall goal is stepwise refinement towards Linuxness or
similar.  So, how far are we from that goal?
-- 
= Warren -- Video articles: http://www.cyberport.com/~tangent/video/
= 
= ICBM Address: 36.8274040 N, 108.0204086 W, alt. 1714m

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple