Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 23:55:29 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Cc: kevin AT wright DOT org Subject: Re: May need a ghostscript maintainer Message-ID: <20010502235529.A1946@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, kevin AT wright DOT org References: <20010423161323 DOT A24872 AT redhat DOT com> <000801c0d37d$f8019580$a300a8c0 AT nhv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <000801c0d37d$f8019580$a300a8c0@nhv>; from nhv@cape.com on Wed, May 02, 2001 at 11:05:53PM -0400 On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 11:05:53PM -0400, Norman Vine wrote: >Christopher Faylor writes: >>> >>Is anyone willing to maintain this? We need to provide an X-less >>version of ghostscript. Norman Vine has managed to do this, so it is >>not an impossible feat: >> >>http://www.vso.cape.com/~nhv/files/cygwin/gs6.62/ >> >>If someone would like to volunteer to do this, please respond to this >>thread. > >FYI >I just downloaded the ghostscript 7.0 source and for the heck of it >just tried the makefile linked from my page with out applying any of >the other fixes that I mention > >Lo and behold gs compiled and made pdf's of all the examples. :-)) > >This was on a binary mounted drive so there may be a fopen bug >lurking somewhere but .... Hmm. I got email from Kevin Wright (ghostscript maintainer) indicating that he'd had problems with ghostscript due to the scanf bug. He was going to wait for a new cygwin version before announcing a new ghostscript version (pressure, pressure). Kevin, are you reading this? cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple