Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Reply-To: From: "Norman Vine" To: Subject: RE: May need a ghostscript maintainer Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 23:05:53 -0400 Message-ID: <000801c0d37d$f8019580$a300a8c0@nhv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2232.26 In-reply-to: <20010423161323.A24872@redhat.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Importance: Normal Christopher Faylor writes: >> >Is anyone willing to maintain this? We need to provide an X-less >version of ghostscript. Norman Vine has managed to do this, so it is >not an impossible feat: > >http://www.vso.cape.com/~nhv/files/cygwin/gs6.62/ > >If someone would like to volunteer to do this, please respond to this >thread. FYI I just downloaded the ghostscript 7.0 source and for the heck of it just tried the makefile linked from my page with out applying any of the other fixes that I mention Lo and behold gs compiled and made pdf's of all the examples. :-)) This was on a binary mounted drive so there may be a fopen bug lurking somewhere but .... My question to the list is "Should I submit my makefile to the ghostscript maintainers for inclusion in the main ghostscript distribution as cygwin.mak" Then I believe to get a functional ghostscript one would only need to unpack the tarball and do % ln -s src/cygwin.mak % make Cheers Norman Vine -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple