Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20010501130800.0165e0b8@pop.ma.ultranet.com> X-Sender: lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1 Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 13:09:09 -0400 To: "Andreas Eibach" , From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" Subject: Re: Questionable inclusion of ghostscript in setup.exe? In-Reply-To: <05b101c0d260$e10d1c00$100b07d5@andreas> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 01:05 PM 5/1/2001, Andreas Eibach wrote: >HI, > >after reading several ghostscript threads in this mailing list for a while, >I ask myself if it isn't at least a bit questionable to really include >ghostscript in setup.exe. Facts are, that - on a standard Cygwin >distribution (i. e. _without_ X) there simply IS NO ready-to-use version of >ghostscript. > >Norman Vine (thank you!) has managed to build a non-X ghostscript, however, >you must build it yourself and the binary distributed with Cygwin will ONLY >work with an X installation due to internal references to /usr/X11R6/*. IOW, >a non-X user can just move the binary to the trashcan because it won't make >use to him/her because it complains about a missing XFree DLL, LIBICE.DLL. > >I suggest to either include a _non-X_ version or omit it because "the way it >comes", it's unusable for people who don't have X. > >Andreas I believe this issue has been discussed. Check the email archives for the details. I believe the direction is to include a non-X version. Larry Hall lhall AT rfk DOT com RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com 118 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple