Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <3AEE3849.4C0CA25@ece.gatech.edu>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 00:15:05 -0400
From: "Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: When will cygwin ever be stable?
References: <4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 2 DOT 20010430105401 DOT 00eb8220 AT san-francisco DOT beasys DOT com> <3AEE2E6F DOT 1044C4C6 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010501000437 DOT C5077 AT redhat DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:33:03PM -0400, Charles S. Wilson wrote:
> >>Each time I install, something might be fixed but something else
> >>breaks.  For instance C-c - using C-c in cygwin is completely
> >>fundamental to its usability and yet it has been fairly broken in the
> >>last two versions I have installed (1.1.8-2 and 1.3.1);
> >
> >You are unfortunately correct about the ^C issue.  However, (and this
> >is the really strange thing) it got fixed in the snapshots *prior* to
> >1.3.1 IIRC, but then broke AGAIN at 1.3.1...but is NOW fixed (again) in
> >the snapshots.  I think.  :-P
> 
> WHAT ^C issue?  What are we talking about?????
> 
> The only issue I'm aware of is being unable to stop a cygwin process if
> all of its standard input/output has been redirected.  That was fixed
> a couple of days ago but it was hardly a new problem.

That's the most recent appearance.  Perhaps I'm misremembering, but I
had thought there were several "signal-handling" things that have
cropped up since January.  CTRL-Z not suspending windows apps, CTRL-C
not able to interrupt a process (regardless of whether its I/O was
redirected), ...

I haven't really paid too much attention to those threads, but that was
my recollection.  I have been known to be wrong, however. 
Occaisionally. :-)

Since Andy is the one who has actually observed the problems with both
1.1.8-2 and 1.3.1, perhaps he could clarify?  Andy? ...

--Chuck

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple