Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 21:27:22 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc: Enoch Wu <enochw AT scn DOT org>
Subject: Re: Pause with make
Message-ID: <20010429212722.B24517@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, Enoch Wu <enochw AT scn DOT org>
References: <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010427154447 DOT 024e7e48 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 96 DOT 1010427144602 DOT 8867A-100000 AT scn> <5 DOT 0 DOT 2 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010427225946 DOT 00ab1468 AT ks DOT teknowledge DOT com> <20010428121110 DOT G14298 AT redhat DOT com> <20010429201450 DOT A24162 AT redhat DOT com> <20010429183438 DOT A3972131 AT MELON>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <20010429183438.A3972131@MELON>; from enochw@scn.org on Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 06:34:38PM -0700

On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 06:34:38PM -0700, Enoch Wu wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 08:14:50PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 12:11:10PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 11:03:31PM -0700, Randall R Schulz wrote:
>
>Is RRS above the same guy who authored the Camel book?

That would be "Randal Schwartz", a nice guy who doesn't deserve the legal
mess he's in.  Different guy.

>>>>Might it be that make is constructing names with two leading slashes
>>>>and hence frequent searches for non-existent network names occur during
>>>>its execution?
>>>
>>>Yes, good theory.  It would explain why some people see this and some
>>>don't.
>>
>>Just to follow up on myself, this should be very obvious when running
>>the program under strace.  A simple search of '//' or '\\' in the
>>strace log would prove whether Randall's supposition is correct or not.
>
>Thanks for the tip.  Would the // or \\ also appear in the make output?

Only if your makefile printed it.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple