Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 21:24:36 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Some comments about the current release Message-ID: <20010429212436.A24517@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: ; from robert.collins@itdomain.com.au on Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:02:36AM +1000 On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:02:36AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com] >> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 10:29 AM >> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com >> Subject: Re: Some comments about the current release >> >> >>>easy. There are 0 full time cygwin-net-release programmers. Chris is >>>a manager (who codes quite well :] ), Corinna as I understand it is >>>there for the embedded system development, but is able to hack on >>>cygwin (For which we should _all_ be grateful!). And the rest, well we >>>are all volunteers with some particular itch we want to scratch. >> >>Actually, Corinna and I (and DJ) are volunteers, too. I'm personally >>working on some signal and path name issues right now but performance >>degradataion does bother me. I hate tracking it down, though. > >Hmm, I must have been unclear - I thought that "0 full time >cygwin-net-release-programmers" would imply that everyone is a >volunteer? No, you were clear. This is my poor-reading-skill-itis acting up again. >>Also, Corinna is a Cygwin engineer, gdb engineer in training. We don't >>have much Cygwin-specific work at Red Hat currently so she's slowly >>transitioning to gdb. > >Sorry Corinna! I muddled my description - I mean cygwin engineer, with >the focus being for the GnuPro tools - would that have been more >accurate? Thanks for the detail Chris. Well.... Cygwin is technically a GNUpro tool so... It doesn't really matter. Your point was clear. I probably didn't need to "clarify" anything. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple