Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <01C0D0EF.3AB6E600.kern@sibbald.com>
From: Kern Sibbald <kern AT sibbald DOT com>
Reply-To: "kern AT sibbald DOT com" <kern AT sibbald DOT com>
To: "'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: Some comments about the current release
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 20:59:05 +0200
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211
Encoding: 48 TEXT

Hello,

I am sorry, I am not subscribed to the mailing list,
and if there is another way of reading it, I'm not 
aware of it. As a consequence, I have not seen
your responses. Robert answered directly to me as well
as copying the list, which is why I responded to
him.

By the way, one Cygwin user did respond directly to
me that the likely source of my problems for the 
library issues is that I didn't use setup.exe, which
is indeed the case.  As a result, I reloaded the
release using tar. This fixes my problem for gzip.exe and
libm.a (as well as the other links). I regret the false 
alarm that generated.

I would appreciate it if you could send your responses
directly to me.  

Thanks.

Best regards,

Kern

-----Original Message-----
From:	Christopher Faylor [SMTP:cgf AT redhat DOT com]
Sent:	Sunday, 29 April 2001 6:23 PM
To:	Kern Sibbald
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Some comments about the current release

On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 01:31:15PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>If your response is the "official" response, I feel sorry for the
>Cygwin project as the performance problem is not my specific problem
>but a problem in general.  The test results that I sent were for the
>execution of ./configure, which does not run one line of my code
>(though the precise sequence of calls is determined by my
>configure.in).

I already provided you with "official" responses to many of
your observations.

Are you not reading the cygwin mailing list?  You only responded
to Robert's mail, for some reason.

cgf


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple