Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3AEC5281.70A0DF80@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 13:42:25 -0400 From: "Charles S. Wilson" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: tar and symlinks References: <3AEAF51B DOT F82E3C04 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010428131012 DOT A20786 AT redhat DOT com> <3AEAFB36 DOT 2ACF1046 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010428133617 DOT A20972 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> So, maybe in three months or so we'll upgrade setup.exe to use the new > >> style but, for now, I think it is doing the right thing. > > > >Sounds ok to me. BUT, tar.exe all by itself behaves the same way. Is > >that *also* the "right thing"? I'm not sure. > > Hmm. I should have checked out what you were saying a little more to > avoid another round of email. > > My version of tar creates the new style symlinks. I just extracted the > cygwin-1.3.1.-1.tar.gz file into a dummy directory. The symlink files > in the lib directory were 'libm.a.lnk', 'libc.a.lnk', etc. I verified > this with the 'dir' command. Yes. I dunno what happened earlier, but I went back and did more thorough tests on both NT/1.3.1 and W2K/1.3.1 and indeed tar does do the right thing. Tar is uses new style symlinks (without the CYGWIN= flag). Setup naturally still uses old-style. Sorry for the noise. --Chuck -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple