Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 12:23:08 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: Kern Sibbald Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Some comments about the current release Message-ID: <20010429122308.A21423@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: Kern Sibbald , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <01C0D0B0 DOT AA5CBDC0 DOT kern AT sibbald DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <01C0D0B0.AA5CBDC0.kern@sibbald.com>; from kern@sibbald.com on Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 01:31:15PM +0200 On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 01:31:15PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: >If your response is the "official" response, I feel sorry for the >Cygwin project as the performance problem is not my specific problem >but a problem in general. The test results that I sent were for the >execution of ./configure, which does not run one line of my code >(though the precise sequence of calls is determined by my >configure.in). I already provided you with "official" responses to many of your observations. Are you not reading the cygwin mailing list? You only responded to Robert's mail, for some reason. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple