Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3AEAFB36.2ACF1046@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 13:17:42 -0400 From: "Charles S. Wilson" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: tar and symlinks References: <3AEAF51B DOT F82E3C04 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010428131012 DOT A20786 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 12:51:39PM -0400, Charles S. Wilson wrote: > >I just noticed something with my recent ncurses-5.2-5 update. When I > >did the "make install prefix=/tmp/usr" step, /tmp/usr/man/man3/* > >contained a lot of symbolic links. Since I did this under cygwin-1.3.1 > >without the "useoldsymlinks" switch (whatever it is), these symbolic > >links were the "new" kind; Windows understood them. > > > >However, after I created the tarball & ran setup on it to actually > >install the new ncurses on my system prior to uploading it, I discoved > >that the symlinks in /usr/man/man3 thus created were OLD style. > > setup.exe only understands how to create old-style symlinks currently. > I think that this is a good thing until cygwin 1.3.1 is more widely > accepted. > > So, maybe in three months or so we'll upgrade setup.exe to use the new > style but, for now, I think it is doing the right thing. Sounds ok to me. BUT, tar.exe all by itself behaves the same way. Is that *also* the "right thing"? I'm not sure. --Chuck -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple