Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 12:15:48 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: Fw: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gcc 2.95.3-4, binutils 20010425-1
Message-ID: <20010428121548.H14298@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <001b01c0cfae$42fb52c0$c4332041 AT campbell>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <001b01c0cfae$42fb52c0$c4332041@campbell>; from DaleCampbell@revolutionist.com on Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 02:41:31AM -0400

On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 02:41:31AM -0400, Christopher Dale Campbell wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>I think he actually meant to reply to the list, instead of just me. 
>However, I've seen questions regarding the upgrade not working, but I
>haven't seen any answers.  Noted in another e-mail, is it possible
>just to downgrade until the problems (if they exist) are fixed?

gcc is working fine for me, so there is little hope that this alleged
gcc problem will be fixed.

So, go ahead and back down to B20.1.  You'll probably want to have
some kind of plan in place for bouncing back to B20.1 after each
setup.exe run, since if no one can debug this problem it will still
be in 1.3.2, 1.3.3, 1.3.4, 1.3.5, etc.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple