Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <008b01c0cf67$f268a7e0$b40c07d5@andreas> From: "Andreas Eibach" To: "Robert Collins" , References: <20010426172415 DOT A32372 AT redhat DOT com> <20989 DOT 988381426 AT www31 DOT gmx DOT net> <022c01c0cf26$54e9a8c0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> Subject: Re: Joe Editor Inclusion Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 00:18:10 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 > > Pity. > > For "small tasks", I usually use DOS's EDIT.COM - for what else should > I > > use? > > vi? That _is_ the alternative - but I prefer the dos-oriented editors like joe or pico. Somebody emailed me privately in the meantime, and we could get to a single point: there are two groups of users: #1 is the UNIX gurus/purists who have disliked windows ever since, #2 is the Windows guys who have a reason to use UNIX as well. The first group is supported - they get their vi (included). We are *forced* to use vi as well because it's the only editor available in the standard distribution - why not support also the people who prefer a dos-oriented editor? This explains my usage of EDIT.COM. Of course, I *am* able to compile stuff and I'd get joe working, but that's not the point. The point is that there's a part of the Cygwin community that's not covered at all - the non-purists. And they will definitely like a dos-oriented editor in the standard (as-is) distribution. Andreas -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple