Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3AE77288.B1F127F1@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 20:57:44 -0400 From: "Charles S. Wilson" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: steve DOT snyder AT philips DOT com CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Request to package maintainers References: <0056910011659348000002L182*@MHS> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit steve DOT snyder AT philips DOT com wrote: > > Hello. > > I would like to make a request of Cygwin's package maintainers: please leave the generated config.cache file in the source package. > > I suggest this to aid in rebuilding from source packages. As it is, those who want to rebuild there own binaries have no idea what config options were used in the standard cygwin build. The user who wants to rebuild the source with config option A may > be losing the options X, Y and Z used in the original cygwin build. The preceeding relies on incorrect assumptions, especially in the case of the packages I maintain. Every source package of mine, includes a subdirectory "CYGWIN-PATCHES" in which you will find a file called "packagename-version-release.README". That file contains detailed build instructions INCLUDING the configuration options I used. In most cases, that file is also installed in /usr/doc/Cygwin with the binary package. In any case, others have already correctly pointed out that "recycling" config.cache between machines is a really bad idea. And that most packagers do not build in their source directory. --Chuck -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple