Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 09:19:20 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: ntsec and sshd question
Message-ID: <20010425091920.F23753@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <F171UsebmspH2q6DqaJ000090d1 AT hotmail DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <F171UsebmspH2q6DqaJ000090d1@hotmail.com>; from karlm30@hotmail.com on Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 11:47:00PM -0700

On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 11:47:00PM -0700, Karl M wrote:
> Hi Corinna...
> 
> But I did not see it before I set 'CYGWIN=ntsec tty'. When I had no value 
> set for the CYGWIN variable, I did not see the extra sshd process. Why is it 
> different now?

Dunno. Could you try "CYGWIN=nontsec tty" and "CYGWIN=ntsec notty"
to check which setting raises that behaviour?

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple