Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Originating-IP: [24.0.161.175]
From: "Karl M" <karlm30 AT hotmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: ntsec and sshd question
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 23:47:00 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F171UsebmspH2q6DqaJ000090d1@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Apr 2001 06:47:00.0964 (UTC) FILETIME=[87BCA240:01C0CD53]

Hi Corinna...

But I did not see it before I set 'CYGWIN=ntsec tty'. When I had no value 
set for the CYGWIN variable, I did not see the extra sshd process. Why is it 
different now?

Thanks,

...Karl


>From: Corinna Vinschen <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
>To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
>Subject: Re: ntsec and sshd question
>Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 08:37:48 +0200
>
>On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 04:22:03PM -0700, Karl M wrote:
> > Hi All...
> >
> > I just turned on 'CYGWIN=ntsec tty' and set up my file protections to 
>make
> > sshd happy (running as a srvany service on win2k sp1).
> >
> > myname AT MACHINENAME ~
> > $ ps -aef
> >      UID     PID    PPID TTY     STIME COMMAND
> >   system     652       1   0  15:39:34 /usr/sbin/sshd
> >   system     800       1  -1  15:39:39 /usr/sbin/sshd
> >   myname    1272       1   1  15:41:23 /usr/bin/bash
> >   myname    1104    1272   1  15:41:30 /usr/bin/ps
> >
> > When I rebooted my machine and did a ps, I saw an extra sshd process 
>that I
> > did not see before. ssh/sshd appear to work fine. Why is there an extra 
>sshd
> > process...is it normal...does anyone else have the same thing happen?
>
>It's normal. It's the parent sshd which has been started by
>SRVANY and which has forked the daemon. It's not needed
>anymore but for some reason SRVANY blocks that the process
>can exit. if you stop the service (`net stop sshd') you
>will see that SRVANY and the first sshd process have exited
>but the daemon itself remains and is fully funtional.
>
>Corinna
>
>--
>Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
>Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
>Red Hat, Inc.
>
>--
>Want to unsubscribe from this list?
>Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple