Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com From: "Tim Peters" To: "Jason Tishler" Cc: "DJ Delorie" , , Subject: RE: Cygwin Python Distribution GPL Licensing Issue? Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 01:10:01 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 In-Reply-To: <20010423113748.F169@dothill.com> Importance: Normal [Jason Tishler] > Hmm, I not sure how to interpret the above. That's because I'm trying *not* to tell you what to do, only what I believe are your options and some of the potentially thorny issues connected with them. In the end, it's your call. > Are you suggesting that I remove readline support from my Cygwin > Python distribution? No. But neither am I suggesting that you don't . I *believe* you're in no real trouble either way; nor Python nor Cygwin either. That's why these msgs are so sprawling: there's simply no killer argument in any direction. > ... > BTW, it appears that I'm not the only packager who has stepped into this > thorny issue: Oh, not by a long shot! As I said, GNU readline is the FSF's GPL lightning rod: it attracts trouble, and by intent. Hmm. There's another ploy in case of trouble: plead entrapment <0.9 wink>. readline-considered-an-attractive-nuisance-ly y'rs - tim -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple