Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 17:31:37 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: vfscanf in newlib
Message-ID: <20010417173137.B29054@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 20 DOT 0104171712130 DOT 23663-100000 AT frontal DOT ibb DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.20.0104171712130.23663-100000@frontal.ibb.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 05:19:46PM -0400

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 05:19:46PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Does anybody know why newlib doesn't implement a trival vfscanf() wrapper
>around __svfscanf() ?

This is a question for the newlib AT sources DOT redhat DOT com mailing list but I
suspect that the answer is probably "Because no one has gotten around to it".

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple