Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: RE: help: Glib under Cygwin X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4417.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 12:39:30 +1000 Message-ID: Thread-Topic: help: Glib under Cygwin Thread-Index: AcDG4jU/DftaV6OXQ56a+Ct/gQ3sWAABILUw From: "Robert Collins" To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id WAA19120 > -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 12:08 PM > To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Subject: Re: help: Glib under Cygwin > > > > > >I have enough problems without needing to swim against that > sort of current. > > Um, yeah, Ulrich is not a Windows lover, to put it mildly. > He's hardly alone > at Red Hat, though. > > I wasn't around during Cygwin's inception but I believe that Cygwin > actually exists because Ulrich was adamant about not porting glibc to > Windows. That would only impact newlib surely? I mean, AFAIK, if glibc was ported wouldn't large chunks of cygwin still be essential? (Console handlers, pipes, sockets, file io, threads, win32 security mapping just for starters...) > However, aren't we talking about 'glib' not 'glibc'? I think David was mislead by one of the early posters jump from glib to glibc. And David then went to do the "right thing" by cygwin, and got jumped on. This sort of negative feedback isn't very beneficial.... Rob > cgf > > -- > Want to unsubscribe from this list? > Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple