Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 16:43:18 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: sh-utils Message-ID: <20010416164318.A20170@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010416161339 DOT 02150ce8 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <15613584769 DOT 20010417003633 AT FreeBSD DOT org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <15613584769.20010417003633@FreeBSD.org>; from demon@FreeBSD.org on Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 12:36:33AM +0400 On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 12:36:33AM +0400, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: >Hello Inc), > >Tuesday, April 17, 2001, 12:13:56 AM, you wrote: > >LHRPI> At 04:09 PM 4/16/2001, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: >>>Hello! >>> >>>Why sh-utils-2.0-{1,2}.tar.gz does not contain >>>su.exe? > > > >LHRPI> It doesn't work. > > >But when I used cygwin this summer (I don't remember version numbers) >su binary *was* in sh-utils. >Whats happened? I removed it because it doesn't work? cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple