Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 00:36:33 +0400 From: Dmitry Sivachenko X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.48f) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091 Reply-To: Dmitry Sivachenko X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <15613584769.20010417003633@FreeBSD.org> To: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re[2]: sh-utils In-reply-To: <4.3.1.2.20010416161339.02150ce8@pop.ma.ultranet.com> References: <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010416161339 DOT 02150ce8 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Inc), Tuesday, April 17, 2001, 12:13:56 AM, you wrote: LHRPI> At 04:09 PM 4/16/2001, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: >>Hello! >> >>Why sh-utils-2.0-{1,2}.tar.gz does not contain >>su.exe? LHRPI> It doesn't work. But when I used cygwin this summer (I don't remember version numbers) su binary *was* in sh-utils. Whats happened? Thanks! -- Best regards, Dmitry mailto:demon AT FreeBSD DOT org -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple