Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 14:36:19 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: Christopher Faylor <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: What's a good stable snapshot DLL?
Message-ID: <20010416143619.A18970@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: Christopher Faylor <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <8F23E55D511AD5119A6800D0B76FDDE11E0F0A AT cpex3 DOT channelpoint DOT com> <200104161740 DOT NAA13650 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20010416135126 DOT C17910 AT redhat DOT com> <81181541863 DOT 20010416222044 AT logos-m DOT ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <81181541863.20010416222044@logos-m.ru>; from deo@logos-m.ru on Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 10:20:44PM +0400

On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 10:20:44PM +0400, egor duda wrote:
>Hi!
>
>Monday, 16 April, 2001 Christopher Faylor cgf AT redhat DOT com wrote:
>
>>>> This is probably a FAQ.  Are the cygwin1.dll snapshots generated
>>>> with debug symbols such that I'll get more information in my Dr Watson
>>>> reports?  If not, do I need to build my own with VC++ 6.0 such that I
>>>> can pull up the debugger when (if) I get the access violations?
>>>
>>>Snapshots are built with gcc, not vc, so even if there's debug
>>>information in it, DrWatson won't see it.
>>>
>>>If you're going to be debugging the dll, you should get the sources
>>>from CVS and built it yourself, and use gdb to debug.  That will give
>>>you the best environment.  However, you'll need to build a copy of gdb
>>>that uses a "debug" version of cygwin, so as to avoid using the dll
>>>you're debugging.  Chris - perhaps you should create a web page on how
>>>you debug the dll?  You've had the most experience with this.
>
>CF> Yeah, I've been thinking about doing this.  Most of the debugging seems
>CF> like common sense, to me.  You set breakpoints and hope that they get
>CF> hit...
>
>i think almost everything starts to seem like common sense after you
>spent several days debugging some non-trivial bug in cygwin1.dll :-)
>At least, from my experience.

I'm not saying that there aren't special tricks that you learn as
you are debugging gdb.

However, most people can't seem to make it to step one -- run gdb.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple