Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 21:11:06 -0700
From: Enoch Wu <enochw AT scn DOT org>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: cvs broken on win2k after recent cygwin upgrade: "The descriptor is a file, not a socket"
Message-ID: <20010414211106.A4160343@MELON>
Reply-To: Enoch Wu <enochw AT scn DOT org>
Mail-Followup-To: Enoch Wu <enochw AT scn DOT org>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 21 DOT 0103210129220 DOT 24576-100000 AT sunshine DOT cs DOT uu DOT nl> <002e01c0b29d$c880d5b0$0401a8c0 AT trinity> <f5by9twn4mm DOT fsf AT cogsci DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk> <010e01c0bafa$f04d9320$2b904f86 AT trinity> <f5bofu2cm9s DOT fsf AT cogsci DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk> <07fd01c0c3dc$cf05f730$0200a8c0 AT voyager> <f5bhezs4e2c DOT fsf AT cogsci DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk> <20010414161237 DOT A4149051 AT MELON> <20010414222231 DOT A805 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010414222231.A805@redhat.com>; from cgf@redhat.com on Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 10:22:31PM -0400
X-Operating-System: CYGWIN_98-4.10 1.1.8(0.34/3/2) i586<http://www.cygwin.com>
X-Sender: ewu AT eskimo DOT com


On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 10:22:31PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 04:13:53PM -0700, Enoch Wu wrote:
> >
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I had the same problem with telnet a while back. Telnet & cvs update have
> >one thing in common -- Unix sockets. I could telnet using Win98 telnet but not
> >Cygwin telnet. At the time my position was: I would let it rest, in the hope 
> >that cygwin developers would get to that problem soon.
> 
> AFAI, neither telnet nor cvs use "unix sockets".  They use regular winsock
> sockets.
> 
> cgf
 
My error noted. I caught another error: this post said "telnet" but my old
post said "ftp":

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2000-08/msg01257.html

Somehow I recall that telnet had the same problem.

Enoch

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple