Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 22:22:31 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc: Enoch Wu <ewu AT eskimo DOT com>
Subject: Re: cvs broken on win2k after recent cygwin upgrade: "The descriptor is a file, not a socket"
Message-ID: <20010414222231.A805@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, Enoch Wu <ewu AT eskimo DOT com>
References: <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 21 DOT 0103210129220 DOT 24576-100000 AT sunshine DOT cs DOT uu DOT nl> <002e01c0b29d$c880d5b0$0401a8c0 AT trinity> <f5by9twn4mm DOT fsf AT cogsci DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk> <010e01c0bafa$f04d9320$2b904f86 AT trinity> <f5bofu2cm9s DOT fsf AT cogsci DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk> <07fd01c0c3dc$cf05f730$0200a8c0 AT voyager> <f5bhezs4e2c DOT fsf AT cogsci DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk> <20010414161237 DOT A4149051 AT MELON>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <20010414161237.A4149051@MELON>; from ewu@eskimo.com on Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 04:13:53PM -0700

On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 04:13:53PM -0700, Enoch Wu wrote:
>
>Hi all,
>
>I had the same problem with telnet a while back. Telnet & cvs update have
>one thing in common -- Unix sockets. I could telnet using Win98 telnet but not
>Cygwin telnet. At the time my position was: I would let it rest, in the hope 
>that cygwin developers would get to that problem soon.

AFAI, neither telnet nor cvs use "unix sockets".  They use regular winsock
sockets.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple