Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: RE: G++ guru's please comment - Re: FW: pthread_create problem in Cygwin 1.1.8-2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4417.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 09:27:14 +1000 Message-ID: Thread-Topic: G++ guru's please comment - Re: FW: pthread_create problem in Cygwin 1.1.8-2] Thread-Index: AcDCEtDSo5aKmhuuRZusU+D5YqEs8gAAsylQ From: "Robert Collins" To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id VAA07432 > -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 6:02 AM > To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Subject: Re: G++ guru's please comment - Re: FW: > pthread_create problem > in Cygwin 1.1.8-2] > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 08:00:10AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > >> This is one of those situations where it looks like gcc can't be > >> released until a version of cygwin is released with the requisite > >> functionality. > > > >What's missing? I have a list of over 20 functions in front > of me that > >I've just coded stubs for... > > What I was referring to is that if we release a version of > gcc which relies > on functions available only in cygwin snapshots that's > clearly a problem. > > I don't know specifically what pthread functionality gcc > uses, however. > > cgf > Sorry, I misunderstood. I thought you meant that you had to hold of releasing gcc 2.95.3 at all until cygwin had enough pthread support to build gcc with threads enabled. Rob -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple