Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: RE: contribution soapbox(was Re: G++ guru's please comment - Re: FW: pthread_create problem in Cygwin 1.1.8-2]) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 13:52:11 +1000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4417.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Message-ID: Thread-Topic: contribution soapbox(was Re: G++ guru's please comment - Re: FW: pthread_create problem in Cygwin 1.1.8-2]) Thread-Index: AcDBbx2imS3xK2HzTkCQlB5nu8fq5AAAb9Yg From: "Robert Collins" To: "Duke Normandin" <01031149 AT 3web DOT net> Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id PAA23639 > -----Original Message----- > From: Duke Normandin [mailto:01031149 AT 3web DOT net] > Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 9:55 AM > To: Robert Collins > Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Subject: Re: contribution soapbox(was Re: G++ guru's please comment - > Re: FW: pthread_create problem in Cygwin 1.1.8-2]) > > > On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 10:36:40PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > [snip] > > thin a layer > > cygwin is over win32 - it's hardly there at all. So I threw out the > > win32 threads code, and fixed up what was missing in > Cygwin. That core > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > Is there a code audit of these "contributions" to Cygwin? Can > *anybody* > get in there and "commit" code/patches? > -- > -duke > > Calgary, Alberta, Canada > > I'm not quite sure why you quoted the word contributions. I wrote the code, and contributed it to Redhat for inclusion in cygwin. I'm not a committer - I only have read only access to the CVS repository. The same level of access you do. ALl my contributions get reviewed by Chris before being committed. As for the "core team" (I don't know the correct label), who can commit into the CVS repository, I believe that Chris reviews post-commit what went in. Certainly, on this very list, alterations have been discussed and even reversed. The fact that my sample code was bad was due to the fact that I'd literally drafted it 10 minutes before, and hadn't sat down and done my first self-review. If you're interested in the cygwin code quality, you can subscribe to the cygwin-cvs mailing list and see for yourself. Rob -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple