Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <001b01c0bf82$722ed760$0101a8c0@oemcomputer> From: "Joe" To: Subject: setup.exe : nice in theory, not-so-clever in practice! Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 17:47:27 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 Hi people, This feedback comes from a longtime Cygwin user, until recently using B19. From the FAQ: >>Unlike previous net releases such as B20.1 and earlier, there is no monolithic >>"full" or "usertools" installation. Rather, you can pick and choose the packages >>you wish to install, and update them individually. Sorry, I *want* a monolithic installer!!! We used to have one with B19, and I would like it back! Please! :) Now, I appreciate that a lot of work has gone into setup.exe, that it's very cleverly done, and that it's new and interesting compared to "boring" traditional installers. But that doesn't stop it being a bad idea. I just want to download a single installer, run it, and install. Drawbacks of setup.exe: * Separate TCP/IP connections have to be established for each component that is downloaded. The speed of a TCP/IP connection typically increases during its lifetime. By using lots of shortlived connections rather than a single long one, you throw away this benefit. * If network problems occur during the installation, you have a semi-complete installation. * If at a subsequent time you wish to reinstall the same version of Cygwin, the means of doing this is far from clear. People use "monolithic" installers for a reason. They're atomic (i.e. a single file), easy to move from one place to another on your file system, easy to manage, and easy to understand. I do believe the phrase "too clever by half" applies to your installer!!! By all means keep the new system, but *please* could you reinstate the option of a monolithic installer too??? Please take these comments in the spirit of constructive criticism! :) Thanks, Joe -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple