Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com From: DJ Delorie Newsgroups: cygnus.gnu-win32 Subject: Re: Setup destroys working Cygwin installation completely! Date: 06 Apr 2001 14:33:52 -0400 Organization: Red Hat, Inc Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: cse.cygnus.com X-Trace: cronkite.cygnus.com 986582032 25647 205.180.230.236 (6 Apr 2001 18:33:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: postmaster AT cygnus DOT com NNTP-Posting-Date: 6 Apr 2001 18:33:52 GMT X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.5 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup cygnus.gnu-win32 "Schaible, Joerg" writes: > Yeah, I suppose. However, you did mention that you were trying to install a version of gcc that you hadn't downloaded, using a setup.ini that you did download to install files that it didn't correspond to. We don't test situations like that. > Sorry. I just thought, that giving you a hint as maintainer with deep > knowledge of the source, would result in a quick fix, preventing setup > uninstalling packages that it has not even offered in the installation list. I'm not really "the maintainer". I'm just the biggest contributor. The code in question was actually rewritten recently by someone else. And you need to click the "full" button to see the full list of what's being offered by setup. It defaults to only showing you things that it thinks will be significant. If there's a bug there, it's up to you to determine how to reproduce it, because we can't fix it until then. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple