Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.2.20010330111936.026799e0@mail.prefres.com> X-Sender: mminnis AT mail DOT prefres DOT com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 11:20:23 -0600 To: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Matt Minnis" Subject: Re: Batch files In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.2.20010330121322.020d15b0@pop.ma.ultranet.com> References: <5 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 25 DOT 2 DOT 20010330101635 DOT 01833350 AT mail DOT prefres DOT com> <5 DOT 0 DOT 2 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010330170402 DOT 042f8150 AT mailhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-SLUIDL: 1E90A148-252E11D5-B72D0080-C813F968 Yes, fred.bat or foo.bat do work now, but so should foo and fred. Is there a way to enable this behavior? Thanks, Matt At 11:14 AM 3/30/2001, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote: >At 11:17 AM 3/30/2001, Matt Minnis wrote: > > > >Is there a way to get Cygwin to recognize that *.bat files are > executeable as: > >fred.bat & fred (without the .bat)? > > >Anything's possible. foo.bat works for me though. > > > >Larry Hall lhall AT rfk DOT com >RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com >118 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office >Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance. ========================================================= Preferred Resources (314) 567-7600 phone 701 Emerson rd. (314) 993-6699 fax Suite 475 mminnis AT prefres DOT com St. Louis, MO 63141 ========================================================= -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple