Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 11:06:40 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: -mno-cygwin Message-ID: <20010330110640.B12883@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <044601c0b929$91291400$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <044601c0b929$91291400$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>; from robert.collins@itdomain.com.au on Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 12:56:09AM +1000 On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 12:56:09AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: >How hard would an alias to -mno-cygwin of -mmingw be? If we're using >mingw libraries and headers,we might get less "why doesn't -mno-cygwin >let me use unix feature questions". > >Then again, maybe not Somehow I doubt it. To rephrase the question: "How come when I use the option to turn off the UNIX emulation support I can't use UNIX features." IMO, -mno-cygwin makes more sense than -mmingw. Maybe a -mno-unix would be clearer, though. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple