Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 00:14:28 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: -mno-cygwin and C++ -- solved! Message-ID: <20010330001428.A11211@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20010328223246 DOT A4677 AT redhat DOT com> <20010329234651 DOT A10894 AT redhat DOT com> <020601c0b8d5$c9cb42a0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <020601c0b8d5$c9cb42a0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>; from robert.collins@itdomain.com.au on Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 02:56:30PM +1000 On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 02:56:30PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Christopher Faylor" >> Would I cause a massive volcanic eruption if I ripped --mno-cygwin out >> of gcc and just suggested that people ran the mingw version of gcc? >> I guess we'd then be subjected to pathname complaints... >> >How would you build cinstall? :] Well, *I'd* build a cross-compiler. But, you're right. There's also strace.exe to consider. Too bad. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple