Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 10:39:03 -0600 (CST)
From: Mumit Khan <khan AT NanoTech DOT Wisc DOT EDU>
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: pthreads support
In-Reply-To: <20010326103918.B7014@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.HPP.3.96.1010326103022.15472D-100000@hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> Not at all.  I now dub you the official Cygwin pthreads maintainer.  I've
> been hoping that someone would step up to work on this and you've done
> more in the last two or three weeks than has been accomplished in the
> last two years.

This is great news! Thanks for all the great work.

Robert, The first "simple" testcase is gcc itself (configured with 
--enable-threads=posix), since gcc uses a very small subset of pthreads
functionality, and that's what I'm going to try as soon as I get a 
chance to update my local tree. For a now-(temporarily-)abondoned glibc 
port to win32, I used the testcases from pthreads-win32 project [1],
and some from the GNU Pth project [2] (I don't remember what my success 
rate was, only that it wasn't that high).

[1] http://sources.redhat.com/pthreads-win32/
[2] http://www.gnu.org/software/pth/pth.html

Regards,
Mumit

ps: The Reply-To is set to cygwin-apps; isn't this more appropriate for
cygwin-dev list? I'm pruning cygwin-xfree.



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple