Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 22:05:45 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: GCC 2.95.3-1 available for testing
Message-ID: <20010324220545.A22307@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20010324210440 DOT A2203 AT redhat DOT com> <20010325022107 DOT 17525 DOT qmail AT web6403 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <3ABCED14 DOT 14098 DOT 112DA95 AT localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <3ABCED14.14098.112DA95@localhost>; from pgarceau@qwest.net on Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 06:53:08PM -0800

On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 06:53:08PM -0800, Paul Garceau wrote:
>
>
>On 25 Mar 2001, at 14:21, the Illustrious Danny Smith wrote:
>
>> 
>> --- Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at
>> 01:44:27PM +1200, Danny Smith wrote: > >cgf wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 25,
>> 2001 at 11:53:24AM +1200, Danny Smith wrote: > >>> Thanks for the
>> upgrade to 2.95.3 > >>> > >>>2.95.3-1 works on my testcases with
>> -mno-cygwin.  > >> > >with > >>>(2) explicit -I/usr/include/g++-3 to
>> find G++ headers > > > >> This directory is searched automatically.  You
>> shouldn't need the -I. > >> cgf > > > >It *is* without the -mno-cygwin,
>> but  with > > > >g++ -c -H -mno-cygwin test_gcc.cpp > >I get: > > Sorry.
>>  It searches /usr/includw/mingw/g++-3 explicitly.  Doesn't it > make
>> sense to put the mingw headers there?  Are the headers generic > enough
>> that this doesn't matter?  
>> 
>> The g++ headers in cygwin are *identical* to the ones that gcc make
>> install put in my mingw package.
>> 
>> I think you'll probably want the
>> > g++-v3 headers from the mingw release in /usr/include/mingw/g++-v3.
>
>	I would agree with this (Me Too! <eg>), but then I think that anything 
>mingw related (that uses the -mno-cygwin switch) should be kept apart 
>from the Cygwin libs as much as possible...the directory structure is 
>already there, might as well use it.  /usr/include/mingw/g++-v3 works 
>for me.

Thanks, Paul.  I should have included you in the "I need a decision"
email.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple