Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 21:38:08 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: GCC 2.95.3-1 available for testing -- question for Earnie
Message-ID: <20010324213808.A28123@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <20010324210440 DOT A2203 AT redhat DOT com> <20010325022107 DOT 17525 DOT qmail AT web6403 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <20010325022107.17525.qmail@web6403.mail.yahoo.com>; from danny_r_smith_2001@yahoo.co.nz on Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 02:21:07PM +1200

On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 02:21:07PM +1200, Danny Smith wrote:
>> Sorry.  It searches /usr/includw/mingw/g++-3 explicitly.  Doesn't it
>> make sense to put the mingw headers there?  Are the headers generic
>> enough that this doesn't matter?  
>
>The g++ headers in cygwin are *identical* to the ones that gcc make install put
>in my mingw package.

How have you verified that?  Did you actually diff the directories?

Regardless, I guess I have to defer to Earnie as to whether we should use the
/usr/include/g++-3 directory or the /usr/include/mingw/g++-3 directory.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple