Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 21:04:40 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: Cygwin Subject: Re: GCC 2.95.3-1 available for testing Message-ID: <20010324210440.A2203@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: Cygwin References: <20010325014427 DOT 935 DOT qmail AT web6404 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <20010325014427.935.qmail@web6404.mail.yahoo.com>; from danny_r_smith_2001@yahoo.co.nz on Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 01:44:27PM +1200 On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 01:44:27PM +1200, Danny Smith wrote: >cgf wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 11:53:24AM +1200, Danny Smith wrote: >>> Thanks for the upgrade to 2.95.3 >>> >>>2.95.3-1 works on my testcases with -mno-cygwin. >> >with >>>(2) explicit -I/usr/include/g++-3 to find G++ headers > >> This directory is searched automatically. You shouldn't need the -I. >> cgf > >It *is* without the -mno-cygwin, but with > >g++ -c -H -mno-cygwin test_gcc.cpp >I get: Sorry. It searches /usr/includw/mingw/g++-3 explicitly. Doesn't it make sense to put the mingw headers there? Are the headers generic enough that this doesn't matter? I think you'll probably want the g++-v3 headers from the mingw release in /usr/include/mingw/g++-v3. >/usr/include/mingw/stdio.h > /usr/include/mingw/_mingw.h > /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/2.95.3-1/include/stddef.h >test_gcc.cpp:2: fstream: No such file or directory > > >I have found another problem, with the way I installed mingw libstdc++: > >With libstdc++.a in /usr/lib/mingw, this lib gets linked rather than the one >in /usr/lib when using default cygwin eg; That would be a bug. I'll fix that. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple