Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <018901c0b0bb$0e2d8110$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: "Tim Prince" <tprince AT computer DOT org>,
        "Blythe.Stephen" <Stephen DOT Blythe AT IGT DOT com>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <B7536E2DB26AD211A42500104BB49C72F604D9 AT manbarapp1 DOT intgame DOT com> <008701c0b081$1d5085a0$9865fea9 AT timayum4srqln4>
Subject: Re: gcc-2.95.3 is released.
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 08:24:58 +1100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Mar 2001 21:19:22.0319 (UTC) FILETIME=[4454D5F0:01C0B0BA]

Tim,
I may be out of my depth here, but I thought the flat rejection went
like "get the patches into gcc, not into cygwin-gcc because we _already_
have far too many outstanding differences with gcc"

Rob


----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Prince" <tprince AT computer DOT org>
To: "Blythe.Stephen" <Stephen DOT Blythe AT IGT DOT com>; <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 1:30 AM
Subject: Re: gcc-2.95.3 is released.


> No; I think David Billinghurst has built it on cygwin, probably
without
> any of the special cygwin features.  Look at the test results page if
> you want to see how well people made it run on cygwin and other
targets.
> I succeeded in making an excellent basic gcc and g77, but the g++
> library apparently remains incompatible with 64-bit alignments, which
> eliminates my interest there.  The maintainers flat out refused to
> accept updates to make gcc-2.95.3 compatible with current cygwin, so
any
> updates you want are up to you.  It should build OK on cygwin B20, if
> you work around the bugs.  David has been doing an excellent job of
> submitting patches to the main line gcc development, so that's
becoming
> a good alternative for cygwin.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Blythe.Stephen" <Stephen DOT Blythe AT IGT DOT com>
> To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 1:37 AM
> Subject: FW: gcc-2.95.3 is released.
>
>
> >
> > Does anyone know if this includes the cygwin patches?  There is no
> mention
> > of it on the announcement page, or of cygwin in the build status
page.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bernd Schmidt [mailto:bernds AT cambridge DOT redhat DOT com]
> > Sent: 16 March 2001 15:52
> > To: gcc-announce AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org
> > Cc: gcc AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org
> > Subject: gcc-2.95.3 is released.
> >
> >
> > gcc version 2.95.3 is now available from
> >
> >   ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/releases/gcc-2.95.3/
> >
> > A more detailed announcement can be found on
> >
> >   http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-2.95/gcc-2.95.3.html
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>
>


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple