Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Apparently-From: <earnie?boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Message-ID: <3AB22378.ADB28A89@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 09:30:16 -0500
From: Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To: Earnie Boyd <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
CC: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: Re: Q: crt0.o vs. crt1.o vs. crt2.o
References: <3AB220A5 DOT CC72DB63 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

"Charles S. Wilson" wrote:
> 
> Is the following statement correct?
> 
> ...crt0.o is for cygwin builds, crt1.o is for builds
> which use "cygwin-gcc -mno-cygwin" with a crt.dll runtime target, and
> crt2.o is for builds which use "cygwin-gcc -mno-cygwin" with an
> msvcrt.dll runtime target.
> 

Yes, the statement is correct.  However, I'll warn that there are other
changes within the specs for CRTDLL vs MSVCRT.

Earnie.

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple