Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:39:38 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: Cygwin Subject: Re: cygwin and ghostscript 5 Message-ID: <20010311153938.A23807@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: Cygwin References: <3AABCC9D DOT E81ABE9D AT home DOT com> <3AABDE52 DOT 60E82F29 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <00c701c0aa6a$db1f97f0$3c5350d8 AT bluesguitar DOT org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <00c701c0aa6a$db1f97f0$3c5350d8@bluesguitar.org>; from matts@bluesguitar.org on Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 02:35:48PM -0600 On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 02:35:48PM -0600, Matthew Smith wrote: >Which brings up an interesting point. Maybe there needs to be some >differentiation (other than at the filesystem level) between the 'core' >cgywin packages, and contrib stuff. Or at the very least, X related stuff >that depends on the X server and libs. Otherwise, people will download >everything using setup, and wonder why stuff like ghostscript doesn't just >work out of the box. If ghostcript is relying on the X stuff, then ghostscript is broken. Plain and simple. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple