Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 12:20:05 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Cc: David Highley Subject: Re: Stack Dump Problem Message-ID: <20010311122005.D6747@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, David Highley References: <200103091619 DOT f29GJt710563 AT hemlock DOT highley-recommended DOT com> <20010309222859 DOT A1355 AT dothill DOT com> <20010309225730 DOT B3200 AT redhat DOT com> <20010311120852 DOT A429 AT dothill DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <20010311120852.A429@dothill.com>; from Jason.Tishler@dothill.com on Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 12:08:52PM -0500 On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 12:08:52PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: >On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 10:57:30PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>The stack dump shows multiple levels of calls of a user program so I >>ass*u*me*d that this was not a Cygwin problem. > >I guess that the above implied that I thought that it was a Cygwin >problem. Huh? The above implies that I may have made an erroneous assumption myself since the problem is solved by upgrading cygwin. I was not impugning anyone. I was admitting fault. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple