Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15016.56290.258169.182575@jupiter.akutech-local.de>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 14:34:26 +0100
From: Ralf Fassel <ralf AT akutech DOT de>
To: Earnie Boyd <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: different behaviour of bash and sh
In-Reply-To: <3AA8D8B1.A873899@yahoo.com>
References: <15015 DOT 59568 DOT 965521 DOT 675165 AT jupiter DOT akutech-local DOT de>
	<3AA8CFB3 DOT 4B515116 AT yahoo DOT com>
	<15016 DOT 54025 DOT 593153 DOT 95134 AT jupiter DOT akutech-local DOT de>
	<3AA8D8B1 DOT A873899 AT yahoo DOT com>
Organization: Akustik Technologie Goettingen (ATG)

* Earnie Boyd
| I was pointing your fallacy especially to the bash-bugs list.

Ok, point taken.  True, I wasn't aware that sh != bash in cygwin.

| If you feel that ash is incorrect then please, download the source,
| fix it, submit a patch to cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com for consideration.

Business as usual :-)

R'

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple