Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: #define Win32_Winsock fails in 1.1.8 To: Earnie Boyd Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.6 December 14, 2000 Message-ID: From: Matt DOT Brozowski AT tavve DOT com Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 19:04:13 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on hercules/Tavve(Release 5.0.6 |December 14, 2000) at 03/08/2001 07:04:16 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I'll get right on it but it may take me a few days. Matt Earnie Boyd cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Sent by: Subject: Re: #define Win32_Winsock fails in 1.1.8 cygwin-owner AT sources. redhat.com 03/08/01 04:45 PM Please respond to Earnie Boyd Matt DOT Brozowski AT tavve DOT com wrote: > > I'm definitely not using WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN. In fact I've run the file > through gcc -E and found that the appropriate headers ARE being included > the problem is that sys/types.h is ALSO being included and should NOT be > until AFTER winsock.h is included. It is unfortunately included before. > The header files are VERY complicated and I don't know the conventions that > are used to ensure they work consistently. I am more than happy to develop > a patch. Is there anywhere that defines the header file conding > conventions that I can read so I can be sure not to screw something else > up. > Matt, can you please provide a simple test case? Earnie. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple