Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 11:09:17 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: An easy (but possibly time-consuming) test case for Make hanging (was: Re: Make hung in WaitForMultipleObjects inside Cygwin) Message-ID: <20010305110917.D14125@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20010228155722 DOT 21696 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <20010228162324 DOT 21997 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <20010228163528 DOT 22101 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <20010301210358 DOT 31563 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <20010302185213 DOT 19881 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <22288145100 DOT 20010302222958 AT logos-m DOT ru> <20010302193602 DOT 22711 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <20010304211455 DOT 5961 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <20010305110244 DOT B14125 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <20010305110244.B14125@redhat.com>; from cgf@redhat.com on Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 11:02:44AM -0500 On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 11:02:44AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 08:57:29AM +0100, Jesper Eskilson wrote: >>Jonathan Kamens writes: >> >>> I've found that if you put the Makefile shown below into an empty >>> directory on a dual-processor machine running Cygwin 1.1.8-2 and Make >>> 3.79.1-2 and run "while true; do make -j2; done", you'll eventually >>> get a Make process hung as I described in my messages last week >>> (although it may take a couple of days). You know things are hung >>> when output stops in the window in which you run the "while" loop. >>> >>> I've reach the limit of my ability to debug this further. Could >>> someone with more knowledge of Cygwin internals try to duplicate this, >>> using this test case? >> >>I can offer to test it on a single-CPU machine, if that is of interest. > >It's not testing that is required. It is someone who is higher limits ^^ has >to their ability to debug the problem. > >cgf > >-- >Want to unsubscribe from this list? >Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple -- cgf AT cygnus DOT com Red Hat, Inc. http://sources.redhat.com/ http://www.redhat.com/ -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple